Rosaura Sánchez’s Statement in Support of a Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions

Rosaura Sánchez is a Professor in the Literature Department at the University of California, San images-1-copyDiego.  She is the author of articles, books and essays dealing with Chicano/a – Latino/a literatures and criticism and theory and a creative writer, author of short stories and co-author of the sci-fi novel Lunar Braceros.  She is a former member of the MLA Executive Committee and a current member of the MLA Delegate Assembly.

Sign the “Open Letter” calling on the MLA membership to endorse a resolution in support of the boycott of Israeli academic institutions. Only the signatures of (former or current) MLA members will be included.

I would like to urge all MLA members to heed the call to support the academic boycott of Israeli institutions in view of Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory and apartheid policies in historic Palestine.  For someone who has long studied the history of U.S. dispossession of the indigenous and Mexican populations in the Southwest, the parallels are all too clear. I am indignant that today’s world tolerates the dispossession and segregation of the Palestinian people and I am especially incensed at my own government for contributing close to three billion dollars a year of our tax dollars to the Israeli state, much of it in military aid to attack, oppress, and subjugate the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank.

It is necessary that Israeli academicians and the Israeli populace rise up in protest of their state’s settler colonialism and stop the establishment of new settlements on the West Bank.  It is crucial that the change in Israeli policies come from within, with Israeli citizen protests and demands to dismantle their state’s apartheid policies and end their unconscionable policies of discrimination, intolerance and rights denial of Palestinians and the blockade of Gaza.  It is time to tear down the wall that separates Palestinians from their land.  The complicity of Israeli academic institutions in these policies, in the denial of education rights of Palestinian students in Gaza, and in the bombing of schools and universities is what leads us to propose the boycott of Israeli academic institutions.  It is not about Jews versus non-Jews; it is about Palestinian dispossession and Israeli violence.  We academics in the U.S. must also place pressure on our own government and on corporations to stop military aid and financial and political support to the Israeli state.  The BDS movement is our opportunity as academics to make our outrage known.   The MLA academic boycott of Israeli institutions will speak loud and clear about our dissent with current Israeli policies of aggression against Palestinians and U.S. collusion with these practices.

 

 

Pranav Jani’s Statement in Support of a Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions

Pranav Jani is Associate Professor of English at The Ohio State University, working in postcolonial studies and US ethnic studies.  Pranav’s book, Decentering Rushdie, examined cosmopolitanism janiand nationalism in Indian English fiction; he’s currently researching the changing legacies of the Revolt of 1857 in the Indian political imagination.  Jani has published scholarly work on Marxism, historiography, nationalism, postcolonial theory and Subaltern Studies, Indian and diasporic fiction and film, and Indian revolutionaries.  His lectures and articles for activist forums can be found at wearemany.org, Socialist Worker, and International Socialist Review.  Pranav is a long-time member of the International Socialist Organization, and is involved in efforts in Columbus around Palestine solidarity, the Black Lives Matter movement, and academic freedom.

Sign the “Open Letter” calling on the MLA membership to endorse a resolution in support of the boycott of Israeli academic institutions. Only the signatures of (former or current) MLA members will be included.

“What, then, remains to be argued?”

In his famous 1852 speech, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?,” Frederick Douglass expertly uses rhetorical strategies to establish to his white, liberal audience that (1) abolition of slavery is a position supported by reason, and ought to be the position of anyone valuing democracy, but also that (2) when all the arguments have been made, and all the logic of this or that position has been debated, there is nothing left to do but to present the horrors of slavery once more, to point directly to the hypocrisy of a “democratic” country that suppresses liberty, and to conclude that disagreement in this matter is ultimately not just about debate or reason but about deeply-held political positions.

Once it is established that the slave is a human being and that human beings deserve liberty, Douglass argues, what is left to say but that slavery must be abolished?  I’m sure you’ve come across these lines, or taught them in class:

At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed. O! Had I the ability, and could I reach the nation’s ear, I would, to-day, pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake. The feeling of the nation must be quickened; the conscience of the nation must be roused; the propriety of the nation must be startled; the hypocrisy of the nation must be exposed; and its crimes against God and man must be proclaimed and denounced.

And so it is with Palestine. Continue reading

Palestine, Settler Colonialism and Democratic Education at UC Berkeley

The University of California has a long tradition of high-ranking administrators on the 14066283_10157447923250515_1892003510723741784_owrong side of history. Clark Kerr’s name lives on in memory for most only as that “able practitioner of managerial tyranny” denounced by Mario Savio in December 1964 in the heat of the Free Speech Movement. This week UC Berkeley’s Chancellor, Nicholas Dirks and Carla Hesse, Executive Dean of Science and Letters, proved once again that Berkeley administrators have yet to learn the lessons of the civil rights movement, though in the intervening 50 years generations of students have flocked to the campus and enriched it financially, intellectually and ethically precisely because of its legacy as a place of social transformation and free intellectual and political exchange.

On Tuesday September 13, Dean Hesse suspended a student-run “Democratic Education at Cal” or “DeCal” course titled “Palestine: A Settler Colonial Analysis” (Ethnic Studies 98/198), which had been approved through the normal, scrupulous vetting process of the Academic Senate. On that day, The Office of the Chancellor, having received a letter of complaint about the course sent by outside pressure groups at 7:35 am, had by 10:26 am replied to the spokesperson for the Zionist campus watch group, AMCHA, announcing the suspension. This is to say that a decision to abrogate the authority of the Academic Senate and to violate the right to education of UC Berkeley students was made in less than three hours by two administrators after receipt of the AMCHA complaint. Continue reading

Lenora Hanson’s Statement in Support of a Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions

This is the first in a series of statements written by graduate students and adjunct faculty that will be published over the coming months. Many of those statements will be published anonymously due to the professional threats students and contingent academics face by organizations like Canary Mission and a general imbalance of academic freedom extended to scholars who support BDS. The author of this statement has chosen to sign her name, despite that risk, in a small act of solidarity with the Palestinian graduate students and faculty who cannot avoid regular exposure to personal and professional harm.      

Lenora Hanson is a Ph.D. Candidate in the English Department at the University of Wisconsin-hanson-picMadison. She is currently completing her dissertation with the support of a Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellowship and is a graduate student member of the Executive Council of the MLA as well as a proud member of the Teaching Assistants’ Association (Local 3220, AFT/AFL-CIO).

What is the relationship between the MLA, as an academic organization with a focus on languages and literatures, and Israel’s occupation of Palestine? Many MLA members have been asking this question as our organization approaches the 2017 Convention, where a resolution to boycott Israeli institutions will be debated.

As someone who is nearing a bid for an academic career in the midst of the adjunct crisis, I have been considering that question in a different way. I have been asking myself: How do we come to decide which political conditions we are responsible for as professionals?

I have been thinking through this question intensely since returning from a ten-day long trip to Palestine with fellow MLA members this summer. During that trip, we met with Palestinian students and faculty inside and outside the West Bank in order to hear from them why the call for an academic boycott has been issued and why they support it. One student at Bir Zeit University made an important intervention that prompted my reflections: “If you are a Palestinian student, your life is about politics. You cannot separate the two.” For Palestinian students, politics—the political—cannot be divided from the mundane elements of academic pursuits. Every moment of their education—from the checkpoints they cross to get to school, to the fear that they will be imprisoned for protesting the occupation—is affected, limited, and enclosed by Israeli state policies and actions. This is to say nothing of the Palestinian faculty and graduate students in MLA-represented fields whose academic freedom and mobility is routinely denied in practice as we debate the definition of those terms at annual Conventions—frequently in the absence of our Palestinian colleagues.  Continue reading

Apartheid in South Africa and Israel: A Radio Interview with Margaret Ferguson

Margaret Ferguson is Distinguished Professor of English at the University of ferguson_2f4326_w2California, Davis.  A scholar of the Renaissance, with many awards and honors to her name, Professor Ferguson  was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2014 and is a recent past-President of the Modern Language Association (MLA). Her 2015 MLA presidential address can be read here.

While she was president of MLA, there was significant discussion of actions that the association might take to show support for Palestinian scholars and students as well as to support American academics who have been denied entry into the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel. The MLA is currently considering a resolution to endorse a Palestinian call for the boycott of Israeli academic institutions, on which its Delegate Assembly will vote in January 2017 during the annual convention.

Click this link to listen to or download the podcast of the radio interview with Margaret Ferguson in which she discusses Israel and apartheid states.

Continue reading

Fred Moten’s Statement in Support of a Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions

TIntype by Kari Orvik
TIntype by Kari Orvik

Fred Moten is the author of In the Break: The Aesthetics of the Black Radical Tradition (2003) and The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning and Black Study with Stefano Harney (2013) as well as Hughson’s Tavern (2008), B. Jenkins (2010), The Feel Trio (2014), The Little Edges (2016) and The Service Porch (2016). He lives in Los Angeles and teaches at the University of California, Riverside.

Sign the “Open Letter” calling on the MLA membership to endorse a resolution in support of the boycott of Israeli academic institutions. Only the signatures of (former or current) MLA members will be included.

I’ve been learning something recently as the rhetorical energy surrounding the idea and actuality of an academic and cultural boycott of Israel—which is the least those of us who are still concerned not only with human life in Palestine but also, and more generally, with unsettled, non-colonial life can do—has increased and intensified. Two ploys are often used in anti-boycott rhetoric and are, therefore, deserving of special notice. One takes the form of a radical refusal/inability to distinguish between individual and institution that emerges as essential to the defense of Israeli academic freedom. The other is the suggestion that an academic and cultural boycott of Israel is legitimate if and only if it is accompanied by similar action directed at every regime structured by the selective application of brutality upon populations under its control or, more specifically, at every settler colony including, and most specifically, the United States of America.

Those of us who are trying to organize and agitate for BDS, both within the Modern Language Association and outside of it, remark, rightly, that those who argue against it in the name of Israeli academic freedom exhibit no concern whatsoever for the far more debilitating and absolute assault on Palestinian academic freedom that Israel has carried out, as a matter of policy, for many decades.

Continue reading

The Malevolence of Occupation

David Lloyd, professor of English at the University of California, Riverside gave a talk in Screen Shot 2016-09-04 at 1.04.18 PMDublin in the summer 2016 about boycott in general and also about his recent visit to Palestine with MLA colleagues.  Now he has published an essay titled “The Malevolence of Occupation” in the Dublin Review of Books, one of Ireland’s best literary reviews. The essay provides background to the boycott movement among US academics, an account of the difficult conditions under which Palestinians must teach and study,  and also a call to support Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS).

You can read Lloyd’s entire essay here. Below are selected quotations from Lloyd’s essay.  Continue reading